HOME Schematics Hobby Corner Dave's Circuits Electronic Resources Book Corner Contact Info

Energy Savings Using Voltage Bucking Transformer

I have read that some people have installed a large inductor in series with their homeís electrical supply to help reduce power consumption.  The idea is that the inductor would have the effect of lowering the AC voltage by shifting the phase relationship between voltage and current.  Could such a device really reduce power consumption and how much would it save?

Many home appliances, such as laptop computers, desktop computers, TVs, DVD players use universal AC to DC power supplies and draw the same amount of power from the power line, regardless of the input voltage.  So, I donít think that lower AC voltage would have any effect with those loads.
Other loads such as light bulbs, space heaters and many fluorescent lamps will draw less power if the voltage was lower.  A lower voltage would mean less light from a lamp but perhaps that would be acceptable.  A compressor for an air conditioning unit might and a blower motor for a furnace would both run slower.  A microwave oven, convection oven and stovetop burners should also draw less power.  However, it might take longer to cook food if the temperature was lower so a lower voltage may not really work for those appliances.  But, overall, maybe about half of all the power used in a typical home would indeed draw less power if the AC line voltage supplied to those loads was lower.
How could you lower the AC line voltage in a home? One way to do this is with a transformer.  I imagine a special type of transformer called an ďautotransformerĒ being used.  This device would be wired into the 120/240 power lines as shown below.  The 240vac input is typically split into two 120vac sides.  The transformer would buck the 120vac down to perhaps 110vac.  In an autotransformer, the device only has to supply the voltage difference and can therefore be much smaller than a fully isolated transformer.  Even with a typical 200 Amp service rating on each side, the autotransformer would only have to be rated at about 4KW.  It could be housed in a junction box, mounted next to the main circuit breaker box.
Letís say a house averaged 2KW of power.  At that power level about 50KW hours of energy would be needed each day. That is 1500KW hours per month.  At the going rate of $0.1 per kilowatt hour, the average monthly electric bill would be $150.  Letís assume that 50% of the electrical power could benefit from a lower voltage.  That puts the lowered monthly average at 750KW hours.
The power reduction in those loads that would benefit from a lower voltage track a square law function with respect to the voltage change.  This means that when going from 120vac to 110vac, the power reduction is the square of the ratio of 110vac/120vac or 0.84.  This corresponds to a power reduction of 16%.  Therefore, of the 750KW hours of typical monthly use that could be lowered would be reduced to 630KW hours.  This is a savings of 750 Ė 630 or 120KW hours.  At the going rate of $0.1 per kilowatt hour, the net savings in energy would be about $12 per month.  After 15 years that would add up to $2160.00.  That just might be enough to buy the big transformer and have it installed on a house.  So, after 15 years, the installation of this big transformer might pay for itself.
Now, suppose instead of the big transformer, you spent just $50 and replaced 5 100 watt incandescent lamps with 5 compact fluorescent lamps, each drawing 25 watts.  Letís say that those lights were used 12 hours per day. The power reduction would be 375 watts and the energy reduction would be 4.5KW hours per day or 135KW hours per month.  That is a savings of $13.5 per month.  In less than three months, the energy savings would exceed the $50 investment.  After that, the homeowner would save about $160 per year.  That sure sounds like a better deal than the transformer. 
So, in conclusion, yes, it does look like a device wired in the AC input of a homeís power line, to lower the AC voltage, might indeed save some money but it might take over 15 years to see a return on the investment.  A much better way to lower the cost of electricity is to change out some incandescent lamps to more efficient fluorescent lamps.

January 2010     Issue 5

Page 1 Back
Good Idea
gone Badly
New Products Rants &
What the World
needs Now
Wily Widget



Imagineering Ezine    Discover Solar Energy Dave Johnson & Associates Faraday Touch Switches

 About Us   |  Advertise on DiscoverCircuits.com   |   Report Broken Links  |    Link to DiscoverCircuits.com  |   
Privacy Policy

Discovercircuits.com endeavors to credit original designers.   Please alert us by eMail so we can
delete links to material that have been copied without your permission
.   Thank you.

© Copyright of all original material on this website is the property
of David A. Johnson, P.E. (Dave Johnson & Associates ) unless otherwise noted.  

Linking is ALLOWED but COPYING any content or graphics to your web site is EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.
All material is provided "as is" without guarantees or warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.